By Delwar Hossain
The United Nations General Assembly resolution on the ‘Situation in Myanmar’ adopted on 18 June 2021 with 119 votes in favour, 1 against and 36 abstentions has raised a fundamental question of excluding a critical issue of today’s world, the Rohingya crisis. The resolution has basically called for an arms embargo against Myanmar and condemned the military’s February seizure of power. The 193-member body also requested unimpeded humanitarian access to stop the country’s slide into poverty, dysfunction and despair. It makes a plea for the Myanmar military to “respect the people’s will as freely expressed by results of the general election of November 8, 2020, to end the state of emergency, to respect all human rights of people of Myanmar and to allow the sustained democratic transition of Myanmar, including the opening of the democratically elected parliament, and by working towards bringing all national institutions, including the armed forces, under a fully inclusive civilian government that is representative of the people’s will.” The resolution was initiated by a core group of 50 sponsoring member states, including the US, EU, UK, and Canada, among others. The core group finalized the resolution in consultation with ASEAN members.
Bangladesh, along with other nations, have expressed their utter disappointment and strong views for the UNGA’s failure to include the Rohingya crisis in the draft so that the resolution would reflect a broad-based and comprehensive reality in Myanmar. In this context, the deliberations of representatives from some members may be mentioned for understanding the importance of the Rohingya crisis. The representative of Bangladesh asserted that the resolution is of utmost to the country, which shares borders with Myanmar. Stability in Myanmar is critically important for finding a durable solution for the Rohingyas hosted by Bangladesh. To Bangladesh, the resolution fell short of its expectations, failing to recognise the urgent need to create conditions for the safe, voluntary and sustainable return of the Rohingyas. Bangladesh makes a strong point expressing disappointment, as the representative in her speech stated that text deviates from other resolutions and outcomes adopted in the Third Committee (Social, Cultural and Humanitarian), the Human Rights Council and the Security Council.
Source: Modern Diplomacy
More Stories
Second Wave of Genocide against the Rohingya: Ending Myanmar’s Humanitarian Crisis Demands Action from the United States
The elder brother is illegally and coercibly recruited by the Millitary regime, and the younger one is abducted by the...
Dhaka Should Take Strong Action Against the Millitary and AA Over Calling Bengali to Rohingya
On 24th March, 2024, the whole Rohingya community was shocked to suddenly see that Bengali were used to refer to...
Starvation and Sorrow: Malnutrition and Misery in the Rohingya Refugee Camp
For Sofura, 40, a mother of two children whose father was killed by Myanmar Millitary, life is not easy at...
Myanmar Border Guards Fled to Bangladesh Amid Ongoing Fighting in Arakan State
According to Bangladesh media, 29 Myanmar Border Guards again fled to Bangladesh due to the ongoing fighting with the Arakan...
Rohingya Reject Junta’s Military Conscription
Myanmar's military junta is once again targeting the Rohingya, this time with a coercive recruitment drive disguised as an offer...
The Rohingya People: Pursuing Safety in an Insecure Shores
The oppressor, even if he can manipulate facts using his tools, resources, and influence for a specific period or within...